What explanation of circumstances have you heard? So far, all I have heard is that matt denies altering the cards. No other info has been released. Please correct me...
I haven't heard any explanation. I was just saying that it's reasonable to expect an explanation in this case, since Matt
(as far as I know) is not a consignment seller (except selling things for Greg sometimes). Whereas, if Tedjeffrey was
discovered selling these, he would likely say (as he did in the case of the re-sealed packs) "my consignor's privacy
is guaranteed."
My point is, a consignment seller can take this route, but it takes a toll on his credibility while giving the consignor a free
pass. In Matt's case, we don't even know if it was a consignment sale, so it surely requires an explanation. Absent
such an explanation, I would not fault anyone for assuming he is at least partially culpable.