Author Topic: Are these people NUTS???  (Read 497560 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Paul_Maul

  • Posts: 2700
Re: Are these people NUTS???
« Reply #2275 on: July 14, 2020, 11:30:29 AM »
Do you wanna tell 'im or should I? eBay auction: #363047638194

It has a bid at $99!

Offline rdsjnk

  • Posts: 235
Re: Are these people NUTS???
« Reply #2276 on: July 14, 2020, 01:41:43 PM »
I'm really on the border - less the funds to bid on this auction.

Re: Are these people NUTS???
« Reply #2277 on: July 14, 2020, 01:57:24 PM »
Seems legit. It really is ďHard to FindĒ THAT many of those types of cards all in one auction.
Canít say Iíve ever actually looked for them though 😁

Offline 70s_Kid

  • Posts: 345
Re: Are these people NUTS???
« Reply #2278 on: July 18, 2020, 01:22:27 PM »
These way overpriced type of auctions have existed since the advent of Ebay.  My question is, why don't these people  do 1 minute of research right here on Ebay to see what their items go for? If his sets were really in nice shape (doubt it) and he sold them separately with nice up close pics, he may get $150 for the pair.  $10,000?  He must think he is sitting on a gold mine.

Note to self:  any unslabbed wackys listed as MINT in brand new condition......  RUN!

it never stops....  :(

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1973-Topps-Wacky-Packages-Original-2nd-Series-Old-Gloom-Toothpaste-White-Back/283493121800?_trkparms=aid%3D1110009%26algo%3DSPLICE.COMPLISTINGS%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D225074%26meid%3Dba038ef9344248b78e640863bb6075f0%26pid%3D100011%26rk%3D3%26rkt%3D12%26sd%3D401761570220%26itm%3D283493121800%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3Ddefault%26brand%3DTopps&_trksid=p2047675.c100011.m1850


Offline ToadallyDude

  • Posts: 307
Re: Are these people NUTS???
« Reply #2280 on: July 21, 2020, 04:15:06 PM »
I finally get to contribute to this thread!  Saw this today & had a good out-loud laugh...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1967-Topps-Wacky-Packages-21-Jolly-Mean-Giant-CUT-OUT/173320426522?hash=item285ab3d41a:g:6KMAAOSw401aQGuC

I'm thinking it's pretty rare considering it would have to be first documented as a #21, and then punched afterwards... which would be crazy.