Author Topic: Flashback sizes?  (Read 134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JailOJohn

  • Posts: 501
  • Sticking Wackys on Furniture since 1973...
Flashback sizes?
« on: November 22, 2022, 01:42:57 PM »
Someone recently posted a comment that one of the two Flashback sets (I think Flashback 1) stickers were a smaller size. I know the album sets were smaller, but what info can anyone provide about the size of the stickers in the Flashback sets?  I did not see this covered on here before…

Online RawGoo

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6556
Re: Flashback sizes?
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2022, 03:51:56 PM »
Someone recently posted a comment that one of the two Flashback sets (I think Flashback 1) stickers were a smaller size. I know the album sets were smaller, but what info can anyone provide about the size of the stickers in the Flashback sets?  I did not see this covered on here before…

The Flashback series was significantly smaller than the original stickers.  Flashback 2 was better.

Re: Flashback sizes?
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2022, 08:50:07 PM »
Someone recently posted a comment that one of the two Flashback sets (I think Flashback 1) stickers were a smaller size. I know the album sets were smaller, but what info can anyone provide about the size of the stickers in the Flashback sets?  I did not see this covered on here before…
As Raw Goo stated, the imagery is smaller than original in the sets, but the cards themselves are the same standard size as always, if that’s what you are referring to?

Offline JailOJohn

  • Posts: 501
  • Sticking Wackys on Furniture since 1973...
Re: Flashback sizes?
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2022, 05:47:24 AM »
I took her earlier post to mean the stickers were smaller. I had not actually noticed the smaller print, so thanks for the clarification…

Online RawGoo

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6556
Re: Flashback sizes?
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2022, 10:28:07 AM »
I took her earlier post to mean the stickers were smaller. I had not actually noticed the smaller print, so thanks for the clarification…

I'm sorry about that, it made sense when I wrote it.....   :-[    Thanks for saying what I meant, Patrick!